Omnibusting: Omnibus Spending Bill, Earmarks, Pork and Budget Gimmicks

Entries categorized as ‘Budget Gimmicks’

Another Top 10 List on the Omnibus

December 18, 2007 · No Comments

Categories: Budget Gimmicks · General Outrage · Policy Riders · Pork Projects
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Top 10 Biggest Problems With the Omnibus

December 18, 2007 · 3 Comments

We’ve pulled together some of the most egregious provisions in the bill and put together this top 10 list. With the Senate planning to vote this evening, time is running out to educate senators about the pork projects, policy riders and budget gimmicks in the bill.

1. Non-emergency, Emergencies Drive Up Spending

More than $11 billion in emergency designated spending has been crammed into this bill, most of which does not qualify as sudden, unforeseen or urgent spending including. For example:

• $100 million in emergency funding for presidential security at political conventions
• $602 million for crop disaster assistance and livestock assistance, in spite of the fact that farmers had record incomes last year.
• $210 million for “salaries and expenses” across various departments

2. A Threat to Border Security

The bill places new restrictions that will delay and in some cases prevent construction of the full border fence. The bill removes specific locations included in the Secure Fence Act and adds extra layers of bureaucracy that will make building a border fence more difficult.

3. Restricts U.S. Energy Sources, Threatening Energy Security

The bill prohibits funding for oil shale commercial regulations which makes commercial production of the United States’ 2 trillion barrels of oil shale resources is impossible. By restricting the supply of domestic oil, this bill increases our dependence on other nations to meet our energy needs.

4. The House Version Does Not Fund the Troops in Iraq

The House provided $31.2 billion for the troops in Afghanistan, but nothing for the troops in Iraq. This ties the hands of Pentagon officials and generals in the field by restricting the battlegrounds where money can be spent and puts troops in harms way.

5. Loaded with Excessive Earmarks

More than 9,000 earmarks — including 300 of which were airdropped— totaling more than $23 billion have been added to the bill. For example:

• The Charles Rangel “Monument to Me” ($1.95 million)
• Rodent control in Alaska ($113,000)
• Olive fruit fly research in France ($213,000)
• Hunting and Fishing Museum in Pennsylvania ($200,000)
• Louis Armstrong Museum in New York ($150,000)
• A bike trail in Minnesota ($700,000)
• A river walk in Massachusetts ($1,000,000)
• A post office museum in downtown Las Vegas ($200,000); and
• The Lincoln Park Zoo in Illinois ($37,000)

6. Funds Corporate Welfare

Advanced Technology Program, was deauthorized by Congress earlier this year, was given $65 million. ATP provides research grants, and 35% of its funding goes to Fortune 500 companies including IMB, 3M, and General Electric.

7. Uses Budget Gimmicks to Obscure Spending

At least $10 billion in gimmicks, such as advanced appropriations and recessions, have been used that artificially lower the cost of the bill.

8. Nobody Has Had Time to Read It

The bill is more than 3,417 pages, which is three times the length of the Bible and nearly the same length as the Second Edition of Webster’s Dictionary. In less than 24 hours, the House passed the bill, but, clearly, no one could have had time to read it.

9. Misplaced Priorities

Funding for security projects such as Nuclear Weapons Modernization ($89 million requested) which helps modernize the nuclear weapons stockpile was cut in order to fund:

• $20 million increase for the National Endowment of the Arts
• $1.5 billion increase for state and foreign operations
• $3.7 million in non-competitive grants that were awarded to the AFL-CIO
• $16 million for a new House office building although the House already has four office building and the Capitol Visitors Center hasn’t been completed

10. Blows Budget Caps

With all the budget gimmicks, “emergency” spending, and other tricks, this bill exceeds the President’s top line by more than $24 billion. The appropriations bills the President threatened to veto were $22 billion above his top line — the omnibus has only made things worse!

Categories: Budget Gimmicks · General Outrage · Policy Riders · Pork Projects

Omnibus Busts the Budget to Pay for Pork

December 18, 2007 · No Comments

Before the omnibus bill was released, The Heritage Foundation set five key benchmarks for determining whether the forthcoming bill would be the fiscally responsible. Brian Riedl explains why bill fails to meet four of those benchmarks.

Congress pledged to limit discretionary spending to President Bush’s $932 billion request and to cut the number of earmarks in half from the 2005 peak level. This omnibus bill breaks both pledges. With more than 11,000 earmarks costing approximately $20 billion, Congress decided to bust the budget by $20 billion through the use of gimmicks. Lawmakers should reject such irresponsible budgeting and eliminate the pork projects in order to offset any new spending. Otherwise, President Bush should veto this bill, and insist on a year-long continuing resolution that would likely save taxpayers more than $30 billion relative to the omnibus.

Categories: Budget Gimmicks · General Outrage · Policy Riders · Pork Projects
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

White House Backing Away From Spending Fight?

December 18, 2007 · 1 Comment

President Bush’s year-long fight with Democrats over federal spending gave conservatives hope that the White House had finally adopted the backbone needed to stand firm for fiscal restraint. It was less clear yesterday the Bush Administration would carry that fight into 2008. The release of a Statement of Administration Policy clearly stated Bush’s intention to veto the omnibus, as it’s currently written. However, Bush appears to be leaving the door open to signing the mammoth bill if money for U.S. troops in Iraq is added.

With the Senate set to tackle the Iraq funding issue as early as today, it appears Congress and the White House are closer to striking a deal than conservatives would like. Yesterday, Office of Management and Budget Director Jim Nussle said he was generally pleased with the concessions Democrats made regarding policy changes in the bill. He all but dismissed the notion of a veto for the explosion of earmarks, which the White House wanted cut in half. And Nussle appeared resigned to the fact that the administration would have to swallow nearly $20 billion in “emergency” spending and budget gimmicks.

The White House’s position has left groups like the Club for Growth deeply disappointed and conservatives frustrated by the apparent willingness to settle for a bad bill.

Categories: Budget Gimmicks · General Outrage · Policy Riders · Pork Projects
Tagged: , , , , ,

$100,000,000 in “Emergency” Spending for Conventions

December 17, 2007 · No Comments

As if Congress didn’t know an election was coming, it has alloted $100 million in “emergency” funding for security at the upcoming presidential conventions at pg 61 in Commerce, Justice and Science.

Categories: Budget Gimmicks

$19 Billion in Gimmicks

December 17, 2007 · 1 Comment

Much has been made of the omnibus bill fitting within the President’s $933 billion discretionary spending cap.  However, the bill contains at least $13.2 billion in additional gimmicks.  Adding to the $6.4 billion in “emergency” spending added to the Defense appropriations bill signed a month ago, the total overage comes to $19.6 billion.  The new $13.2 billion breaks down as follows:

–$2.0 billion in advanced appropriations in the Labor-HHS-Education bill;

–$3.7 billion in “emergency” veterans health funding in the Milcon/VA bill;

–$2.9 billion for “emergency” border security in the Homeland Security bill;

–$2.4 billion for various “emergency” provisions in the State/Foreign Ops bill;

–$1.0 billion for “emergency” drought relief (despite record farm incomes), wildfires, and others in the agriculture bill;

– $100 million in unprecedented “emergency” security spending for the GOP and Democratic national conventions, in the Commerce-Justice-Science bill; and

–$1.1 billion in other “emergencies”

 

This $19.6 billion brings discretionary spending to $952 billion, nearly as high as the Congressional Democrat’s original proposal.  Note that these gimmicks are on top of the $20 billion in domestic spending that the President had already agreed to. There is no reason this additional $19.6 billion should not be offset.

Categories: Budget Gimmicks
Tagged: , ,

RSC Press Release on Omnibus

December 17, 2007 · No Comments

Congressman Jeb Hensarling (R-TX), Chairman of the Republican Study Committee, this morning issued the following statement after Democrats released a 3,565-page FY 2008 Omnibus Appropriations bill that is expected to be voted on later today. 

“An initial review of this 3500 plus page bill confirms that this legislation is a bad for deal for American taxpayers, American families and the fiscal future of our children.   Democrats squandered an opportunity to work together on a clean bill that is free of wasteful earmarks and budget gimmicks.   

“Just three years ago, then Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi called the refusal to allow Members three days to read legislation before voting on it ‘martial law.’  Abandoning her word, Speaker Pelosi is now engaging in ‘martial law’ herself by trying to force a 3500 page bill containing 11 individual spending bills through Congress before anyone knows exactly what is in it.   

“We know that this bill contains over 8000 earmarks.  Those earmarks, combined with budget gimmicks that hide billions of dollars and other added-on spending ensure that the Democrats’ bill is well over the spending level requested by President Bush.   While providing additional funds for our veterans is important, that extra spending must be offset elsewhere in this trillion dollar budget…

Categories: Budget Gimmicks · Policy Riders · Pork Projects
Tagged: ,